UK: Judge warned over drinking during a hearing break

Evidence indicated the judge had consumed alcohol in her chambers and as a result the hearing could not proceed to a conclusion.

Is allowance instantly strangers applauded

An employment judge in England has been formally reprimanded for appearing to have drunk alcohol midway through a day’s hearing.

According to a ruling of the country's Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (JCIO), employment judge Pauline Hughes was part of a panel of three tribunal members hearing a case in  2021. Midway through the day, following a break in the hearing, her fellow panel members became concerned about a change in her behaviour and said they believed she might be intoxicated.

Evidence indicated the judge had consumed alcohol in her chambers and as a result the hearing could not proceed to a conclusion.

When Hughes, who has not sat since the incident, was well enough to meet her tribunal president in August last year, she had little recollection of the incident but did not dispute that she must have consumed alcohol at work on that day.

A spokesperson for the JCIO said the senior president of tribunals, on behalf of the lord chief justice and with the lord chancellor’s agreement, had issued Hughes with a formal warning for misconduct.

They added: ‘In making a finding of misconduct and recommending a sanction of formal warning, the tribunal president took into account that Judge Hughes, who has served the tribunal for many years, had not sought to deny drinking alcohol, had expressed remorse for her actions and gave assurances as to her future conduct, including in relation to alcohol use.’

According to the judiciary website, Hughes is the seventh longest-serving employment tribunal judge. She was appointed in January 2006, has been based at the Birmingham tribunal and edited a book on discrimination law.