AG Calls for Circumspection in Wake of Afoko-Alangde Jury Verdict

The high-profile 2015 murder trial in Ghana sparks debate on the country's legal system and the need for reform.

Is allowance instantly strangers applauded

The recent trial of Gregory Afoko and Asabke Alangde in Ghana has brought to light the challenges posed by the country's jury system. In the wake of the trial, the Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, has called for circumspection and legal amendments to Ghana's criminal procedure laws, citing the need for a more efficient administration of justice.

The trial stemmed from the 2015 murder of the late Upper East Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party, Alhaji Adams Mahama. The trial resulted in a 4-3 not guilty verdict on both murder and conspiracy to commit murder charges against Afoko. Meanwhile, Alangde was found unanimously guilty of conspiracy to commit murder but received a 4-3 not guilty verdict for the murder charge, leading to a death sentence by hanging.

The Attorney General has highlighted the need for legal reform to address the challenges presented by the current jury system. Dame is taking steps to propose legal reforms aimed at improving the overall efficiency and fairness of the administration of justice in Ghana.

The case has drawn significant public attention, further emphasizing the need for reform in the country's jury system. The Attorney General has also called on the public and lawyers to respect the legal process and refrain from making comments that could jeopardize the sound and efficient administration of justice.

The trial and the Attorney General's call for circumspection have reignited discussions surrounding the 2015 murder of Alhaji Adams Mahama, a case that continues to be a topic of concern and interest in Ghana.